A graphic recently came up on facebook with a quote from Christian comedian Mark Lowry.
"Love the sinner, hate the sin? How about: Love the sinner, hate your own sin! I don't have time to hate your sin. There are too many of you! Hating my sin is a full-time job. How about you hate your sin, I'll hate my sin and let's just love each other!"
- Mark Lowry
Since it's hard to trust the truth of these things, I double checked and the quote is on Mark's site.
It's certainly a nice, tolerant sentiment. But as I commented when I saw it on Facebook, it's not a biblical or charitable sentiment.
(For the record, the only attribution I can find on "Love the Sinner, Hate the Sin" is Mahatma Gandhi. So no, the quote isn't found in the Bible.)
The war for our souls is indeed personal. The eternal revolution for the Kingdom of God is within each and every one of us. But at the same time, just as we should look to our own battle, we should not neglect our neighbors, our brothers and sisters.
The quote is "hate THE sin." Mr. Lowry's error appears to be assigning ownership of the sin. "Your sin," "my sin." Sin is an act of will that cuts us off from God. To jump to an extreme, if one person murders someone, murder is the sin. It doesn't become "his sin." It's an act he committed. His act, but still the sin of murder. The expression "There's so many of you" belies this sentiment; there are many of us, but comparatively very few sins.
I don't believe Jesus spoke idly. When He he rendered judgement in the case of the adulterous woman (John 8:1-11), He dismissed her persecutors but still admonished her, "Go and sin no more."
Jesus cleansed the temple, condemned the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, told his followers to judge by the fruits, and gave them counsel on how to address sins of others (Matthew 18:15+) . The whole parable of the good Samarian was a clarification of who your neighbor was (answer: even your worldly enemies) - a question raised by the second great commandment to "Love Your Neighbor as Yourself."
So if you hate the sin that you commit, don't neglect to loathe it because it is destroying the eternal life of someone else.
And that's just from that nice fellow Jesus in the New Testament.
When we go back to the Old Testement, God clearly instructs the prophets that they will be accountable for not guiding others. (Ezekiel 3:18, for instance).
It is certainly not charitable to tell people that God hates them (which is a lie, Jesus died for everyone, a sacrifice of love). But it is also uncharitable to tell them that you don't detest "their sin," simply because it affects their soul and not yours.
So love your neighbor as yourself, for God loves them as well as you. That includes not only the LGBT community, but the serial killers, the rapists, the murderers, the thieves, the prostitutes, the politicians, the child molesters, the pornographers, the dictators, the socialists, the capitalists, and even other Christians.
Who ever said charity was easy or nice? No one in the Bible, that's for certain. Neither did those ancient warriors, the samurai.
In the Hagakure (quoted in The Way of the Christian Samurai) it is written:
“To give a person one’s opinion and correct his faults is an important thing. It is compassionate and comes first in matters of service. But the way of doing this is extremely difficult. To discover the good and bad points of a person is an easy thing, and to give an opinion concerning them is easy, too. For the most part, people think that they are being kind by saying things that others find distasteful or difficult to say. But if it is not received well, they think that there is nothing more to be done. This is completely worthless. It is the same as bringing shame to a person by slandering him. It is nothing more than getting it off one’s chest.
To give a person an opinion one must first judge well whether that person is of the disposition to receive it or not. One must become close with him and make sure that he continually trusts one’s word. Approaching subjects that are dear to him, seek the best way to speak and to be well understood. Judge the occasion, and determine whether it is better by letter or at the time of leavetaking. Praise his good points and use every device to encourage him, perhaps by talking about one’s own faults without touching on his, but so that they will occur to him. Have him receive this in the way that a man would drink water when his throat is dry, and it will be an opinion that will correct faults.
This is extremely difficult. If a person’s fault is a habit of some years prior, by and large it won’t be remedied. I have had this experience myself. To be intimate with all one’s comrades , correcting each other’s faults, and being of one mind to be of use to the master is the great compassion of a retainer. By bringing shame to a person, how could one expect to make him a better man?”
Now if a pagan warrior can show this much compassion and charity but still counsel his brother about "his" sin, how can you as a Christian do any less? Certainly not by condemning and damming a person, but neither by dismissing someone else's sin as their own problem and reserving all judgement.
Hey, it's not called the narrow way for nothing.
An online friend pointed out Augustine's The City of God
(Book 14, chapter 6):
"Wherefore the man who lives according to God, and not according to man, ought to be a lover of good, and therefore a hater of evil. And since no one is evil by nature, but whoever is evil is evil by vice, he who lives according to God ought to cherish towards evil men a perfect hatred, so that he shall neither hate the man because of his vice, nor love the vice because of the man, but hate the vice and love the man. For the vice being cursed, all that ought to be loved, and nothing that ought to be hated, will remain."